On the effectiveness of virtual reality technology for relaxation of locomotive crew workers

Reducing the risks of occupational stress requires improving the methods of psychological support for employees of locomotive crews. Virtual reality technology offers restorative measures comparable to traditional techniques.

The study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the impact of virtual reality technology on the basis of the analysis of the psycho-emotional state of employees of locomotive crews before and after rehabilitation measures; to evaluate the ratio of stress biomarkers before and after exposure to classical and technical techniques; to compare the effectiveness of psychological influence carried out by various methods.

The scientists conducted a survey and diagnosis of the functional state of locomotive crew workers, followed by rehabilitation measures using various methods. The specialists performed a saliva analysis based on the concentration levels of cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone. 120 people took part in the study, of which: 60 people according to the classical program and 60 people according to the virtual reality program, of which 15 people are at risk according to psychophysiological indicators. The session lasted 21 minutes. The average age of employees of locomotive crews participating in the study was 35.4 years.

88% of the subjects underwent functional state diagnostics and a full course of relaxation sessions in virtual reality. Of these, 73% have improved psychophysiological indicators: response accuracy, increased neuropsychiatric stability, and decreased anxiety levels. The authors noted calmness, improved mood and relief of muscle tension. 60% of the employees have completed a full course of rehabilitation measures using classical techniques. Of these, 70% have an improvement in their functional state according to certain parameters. There is a decrease in cortisol levels (unit of measurement — nanograms per milliliter) from 6.75 ng/ml to 6.28 ng/ml with a simultaneous increase in dehydroepiadrosterone levels (unit of measurement — micrograms per milliliter) from 0.53 mcg/100 ml to 1.77 mcg/100 ml, which corresponds to a decrease in the overall stress level. The analysis of the obtained results showed sufficient effectiveness of virtual methods comparable to classical approaches to relaxation.

Immersive technologies more effectively activate natural compensatory mechanisms by expanding the individual regulatory capabilities of the nervous system. Scientists have identified areas for improving the latest methods of rehabilitation measures in order to correct the functional condition of locomotive crews.

Limitations. The representativeness of the sample was ensured by the participation of 120 employees of locomotive crews in the study. The limitations are related to the gender homogeneity of the sample: only men are included, due to their professional status.

Ethics. The study was performed in accordance with the rules of good clinical practice and the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association, the conclusion of the ethics committee was not required.

Contribution:
Kostenko N.A. — fundamental elements of the article, such as concept, design, methodology;
Bukhtiyarov I.V. — concept and design of the study;
Borisova E.V. — data processing, analysis, interpretation, editing and other technical work.

Funding. The study had no funding.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Received: 03.09.2024 / Accepted: 29.09.2024 / Published: 08.11.2024

1. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Rubtsov M.Yu., Yushkova O.I. Professional stress as a result of shift work as a risk factor for health problems in workers. Analiz riska zdorovyu. 2016; 3(15): 110–121. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2016.3.12 (in Russian).

2. Karetskaya T.D., Pfaff V.F., Chernov O.E. Occupational morbidity in railway transport. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2015; 1: 1–5 (in Russian).

3. Razumov S.A. Emotional reactions and emotional stress. L.: Medicine; 1976: 5–32 (in Russian).

4. Selye G. Stress without distress. 1970 (in Russian).

5. Anderson A.P., Mayer M.D., Fellows A.M., Cowan D.R., Hegel M.T., Buckey J.C. Relaxation with immersive natural scenes presented using virtual reality. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance. 2017; 88: 520–526.

6. Annerstedt M., Norman J., Boman M., Mattsson L., Grahn P., Währborg P. Finding stress relief in a forest. Ecological Bulletins. 2010; 53: 33–42.

7. Kim H., Kim D.J., Kim S., Chung W.H., Park K.A., Kim J.D., Kim D., Kim M., Kim K., Jeon H.J. Effect of Virtual Reality on Stress Reduction and Change of Physiological Parameters Including Heart Rate Variability in People with High Stress: An Open Randomized Crossover Trial. Frontiersin Psychiatry. 2021. 12: 614539.

8. Lee J., Park B.J., Tsunetsugu Y., Kagawa T., Miyazaki Y. Restorative effects of viewing real forest landscapes, based on a comparison with urban landscapes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2009. 24: 227–234.

9. Park B.J., Tsunetsugu Y., Kasetani T., Hirano H., Kagawa T., Sato M., Miyazaki Y. Physiological effects of shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest) using salivary cortisol and cerebral activity as indicators. Journal of physiological anthropology. 2007; 26: 123–128.

10. Kozlov A.I., Kozlova M.A. Cortisol as a stress marker. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2014; 40(2): 123–136. https://doi.org/10.7868/S013116461402009X (in Russian).

11. Goncharov N.P., Katsiya G.V. Dehydroepiandrosterone: biosynthesis, metabolism, biological action and clinical application (analytical review). Andrologiya i genital’naya khirurgiya. 2015; 1: 13–22. https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2015-1-13-22 (in Russian).

12. Dutheil F. et al. DHEA as a Biomarker of Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Psychiatry. 2021; 12: 688367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.688367

13. Kovshova O.S., Chaplygin S.S., Bragin D.A. Method of applied psychodiagnostics implemented by means of virtual reality technologies. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii. 2021; 13(1): 6. https://doi.org/10.24412/2219-8245-2021-1-6 (in Russian).

14. Côté S., Bouchard St. Documenting the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exposure with Psychophysiological and Information Process ing Measures. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2005; (30)3: 217–232.

15. Chernov O.E., Alekseev S.A., Kolyagin V.Ya. Medical and psychological support for the safety of professional activities of locomotive crew workers. Med. truda i prom. ekol. 2017; (7): 3–9 (in Russian).

16. Kuzmina A.S. Analysis of foreign studies of human experience in a virtual reality environment. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ehkologiya i bezopasnost’ zhiznedeyatel’nosti. 2014; 2: 102–112 (in Russian).

17. Popova E.V. Virtualia of life. Newton. 2014; 7: 17–28 (in Russian).

18. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition. 2007; 16(2): 229–240.

19. Zinchenko Yu.P., Menshikova G.Ya., Bayakovsky Yu.M. et al. Virtual reality technologies: methodological aspects, achievements and prospects. Natsional’nyĭ psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2010; 1(3): 21–30 (in Russian).

20. Ehrsson H.H. Experimental Induction of Out of Body Experiences. Science. 2007; 317(5841): 1048.

21. Menard C. et al. Immune and Neuroendocrine Mechanisms of Stress Vulnerability and Resilience. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews. 2017; 42: 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.90

22. Petros N. et al. Psychometric and neurobiological assessment of resilience in a non-clinical sample of adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013; 38: 2099–2108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.03.022