Preview

Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Reproductive disorders in male workers under the influence of a chemical production factor

https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2024-64-8-531-541

EDN: jtvgmz

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been a tendency in the world to decrease the qualitative and quantitative indicators of spermatogenesis, which can lead to a decrease in male fertility up to infertility, and become one of the main reasons for a decrease in the birth rate in the population.

The purpose of the study is to systematize scientific literature data on the influence of chemical production factors on the reproductive health of male workers. The researchers applied the method of analytical review of publications in scientific electronic libraries (Elibrary, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus) on the effect of chemicals on the reproductive health of working men. The data of epidemiological, clinical and experimental studies are presented, indicating the vulnerability of the reproductive health of working men to the effects of chemicals both in production and in the environment.

During industrial exposure of male workers to a number of organic solvents, the authors revealed reproductive health disorders: changes in sperm motility and morphology, a decrease in qualitative and quantitative parameters of spermatozoa — under the action of glycol esters, acetone; an increase in the period before conception and pregnancy determination in the wives of workers who had contact with trichloro- and tetrachloroethylene; an increase in cell death (apoptosis) and disruption of the life cycle of spermatozoa — when exposed to benzene. During professional exposure to phthalates, scientists have identified a relationship between the level of the substance in the biological environment of the body of workers and a decrease in sperm quality, as well as a change in the ratio of testosterone and estradiol. The mechanism of sperm quality change is based on the action of free radicals, lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial dysfunction. There is a large number of works devoted to the professional effects of lead on the reproductive system of workers, and there is also some data on the effect of other metals — cadmium, mercury, boron, manganese, hexavalent chromium, aluminum on male reproduction. Experimental animal studies confirm the toxic effect of these metals on male gonads.

The main mechanisms of reproductive toxicity of pesticides in men are due to the fact that many pesticides are endocrine disruptors (destroyers), which, acting in the antenatal period or on the adult body, affect the processes of synthesis, secretion, metabolism, binding to hormone receptors that regulate, among other things, reproductive processes.

Researchers have statistically significant data that the presence of major pollutants in the ambient air can affect sperm parameters, their morphology, DNA fragmentation, as well as the level of sex hormones.

The protection of the reproductive health of male workers in the workplace is an urgent problem. It is necessary to further accumulate data and create comprehensive programs to study the reproductive health of male workers in order to develop preventive measures.

Contribution:
Fesenko M.A. — research concept and design, data analysis and interpretation;
Golovaneva G.V. — research concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, text writing, editing;
Miteleva T.Yu. — collecting and processing material, writing text.

Funding. The study had no funding.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Received: 08.07.2024 / Accepted: 02.08.2024 / Published: 15.09.2024

About the Authors

Marina A. Fesenko
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health
Russian Federation

Head of the Laboratory for the Prevention of Workers' Reproductive Health Disorders, Dr. of Sci. (Med.)

e-mail: fesenkoma@irioh.ru



Galina V. Golovaneva
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health
Russian Federation

Leading Researcher, Laboratory for the Prevention of Workers' Reproductive Health Disorders, Dr. of Sci. (Med.)

e-mail: galstella@mail.ru



Tatyana Yu. Miteleva
Izmerov Research Institute of Occupational Health
Russian Federation

Researcher of the laboratory of prevention of reproductive health disorders of workers, Cand. of Sci. (Med.)

e-mail: miteleva@irioh.ru



References

1. Fauser B.C.J.M., Adamson G.D., Boivin J., et al. Contributors and members of the IFFS Demographics and Access to Care Review Board. Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2024; 1; 30(2): 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad028 PMID: 38197291; PMCID: PMC10905510.

2. Vollset S.E., Goren E., Yuan C.W. et al. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020; 17; 396(10258): 1285–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30677-2

3. Aitken R.J. The changing tide of human fertility. Hum. Reprod. 2022; 37(4): 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac011

4. Mann U., Shiff B., Patel P. Reasons for worldwide decline in male fertility. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2020; 30(3): 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000000745

5. Rogozin D.S. Male fertility: a summary overview of the publications October 2022 — March 2023. Vestnik Urologii. 2023; 11(2): 235–242. https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-2-235-242

6. World health statistics 2023: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240074323

7. Eisenberg M.L., Esteves S.C., Lamb D.J. et al. Male infertility. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2023; 9(1): 49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00459-w

8. Litvinova N.A., Lesnikov A.I., Tolochko T.A., Shmelev A.A. Factors affecting male fertility: a review. Fundamental’naya i klinicheskaya meditsina. 2021; 2: 124–135.

9. Joseph S., Mahale S.D. Male Infertility Knowledgebase: decoding the genetic and disease landscape. Database (Oxford). 2021; 7. https://doi/10.1093/database/baab049

10. Schrader S.M., Marlow K.L. Asian аssessing the reproductive health of men with occupational exposures. J. Androl. 2014; 16(1): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.4103%2F1008-682X.122352

11. Frank A. Patty. Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology. New York; 1958.

12. Hess R.A. Effects of environmental toxicants on the efferent ducts, epididymis and fertility. J. Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1998; 53: 247–259.

13. Mangelsdorf I., Buschmann J., Orthen B. Some aspects relating to the evaluation of the effects of chemicals on male fertility. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003; 37: 356–369.

14. Pavlov V.N., Teregulov B.F. Reproduktivnoe zdorov’e muzhchin-rabotnikov v usloviyah vozdejstviya neblagopriyatnyh faktorov proizvodstvennoj i okruzhayushchej sredy. Meditsina truda i ekologiya cheloveka. 2015; 4: 182–188.

15. Mima M., Greenwald D., Ohlander S. Environmental Toxins and Male Fertility. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2018; 19(7): 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0804-1

16. Ramsay J.M., Fendereski K., Horns J.J. et al. Environmental exposure to industrial air pollution is associated with decreased male fertility. Fertil Steril. 2023; 120(3 Pt 2): 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.143

17. Chemical Substances — Cas Registory. https//www.cas.org/content/chemical-substances (Accessed 28.05.2024).

18. Rahmanin Yu.A. Updating the methodological problems of regulating chemical pollution and studying its impact on the quality of life and health of the population. Collection: Methodological problems of studying, assessing and regulating chemical pollution of the environment and its impact on public health. Proceedings of the Plenum of the Scientific Council of the Russian Federation on Human Ecology and Environmental Hygiene, edited by Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Yu.A. Rakhmanin. 2015; 3–11.

19. Dai X.C., Zhang M.Q., Chen G. et al. Will male semen quality improve with environmental quality? Asian J. Androl. 2022; 15. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202239

20. Mai H., Ke J., Li M. et al. Association of living environmental and occupational factors with semen quality in Chinese men: a cross-sectional study. Sci. Rep. 2023; 13(1): 15671. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42927-z

21. Sciorio R., Tramontano L., Adel M., Fleming S. Decrease in Sperm Parameters in the 21st Century: Obesity, Lifestyle, or Environmental Factors an Updated Narrative Review. J Pers Med. 2024; 14(2): 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14020198

22. Punab M., Poolamets O., Paju P. et al. Causes of male infertility: a 9-year prospective monocentre study on 1737 patients with reduced total sperm counts. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(1): 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew284

23. Vorob’eva A.A., Ustinova O.Yu., Vlasova E.M. et al. Rol’ vrednyh proizvodstvennyh faktorov v razvitii reproduktivnyh narushenij u rabotnikov predpriyatij himicheskoj promyshlennosti. Profilakticheskaya meditsina. 2021; 10: 99–105.

24. Gorbushina O.Yu. Features of the influence of chemicals on the reproductive health of men working in chemical industry enterprises. In: «Proceedings of the 16th Russian National Congress with international participation «Profession and Health», Vladivostok, September 21–24, 2021, Vladivostok; 2021: 150–154. https://doi.org/10.31089/978-5-6042929-2-1-2021-1-150-154

25. Cannarella R., Gül M., Rambhatla A., Agarwal A. Temporal decline of sperm concentration: role of endocrine disruptors. Endocrine. 2023; 79(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03136-2

26. Lahimer M., Abou Diwan M., Montjean D. et al. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and male fertility: from physiological to molecular effects. Front Public Health. 2023; 11: 1232646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1232646

27. Cicolella A. Glycol ethers reproductive risks. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2006; 34(10): 955–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.07.034

28. Welch L.S., Schrader S.M., Turner T.W., Cullen M.R. Effects of exposure to ethylene glycol ethers on shipyard painters: II. Male reproduction. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1988; 14: 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700140503

29. Figa-Talamanca I., Cini C., Traina M.E. Effects of glycol ethers on reproductive health of occupationally exposed individuals: review of the present day evidence. J. Clean Technol. Environ. Toxicol Occup Med. 1997; 6: 323–337.

30. Cherry N., Moore H., McNamee R. et al. Occupation and male infertility: glycol ethers and other exposures. Occup Environ Med. 2008; 65(10): 708–14.

31. De Fleurian G., Perrin J., Ecochard R. et al. Occupational exposures obtained by questionnaire in clinical practice and their association with semen quality. J. Androl. 2009; 30(5): 566–79. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.108.005918

32. Kurinczuk J.J., Clarke M. Case-control study of leatherwork and male infertility. Occup. Environ. Med. 2001; 58(4): 217–24. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.4.217

33. Hooiveld M., Haveman W., Roskes K. et al. Adverse reproductive outcomes among male painters with occupational exposure to organic solvents. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006; 63(8): 538–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.026013

34. Daoud S., Sellami A., Bouassida M. et al. Routine assessment of occupational exposure and its relation to semen quality in infertile men: a cross-sectional study. Turk. J. Med Sci. 2017; 47(3): 902–7. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1605-47

35. Wang H.X., Li H.C., Lv M.Q. et al. Associations between occupation exposure to Formaldehyde and semen quality, a primary study. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 15874. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15874

36. Lv M.Q., Wang H.X., Yang Y.Q. et al. Semen Quality Following Long-term Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(9): 2230359. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen

37. Jurewicz J., Radwan M., Sobala W. et al. Association between a biomarker of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and semen quality. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2013; 26(5): 790–801. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-013-0152-9

38. Jelnes J.E. Semen quality in workers producing reinforced plastic. Reprod Toxicol. 1988; 2(3–4): 209–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6238(88)90024-x

39. Eskenazi B., Wyrobek A.J., Fenster L. et al. A study of the effect of perchloroethylene exposure on semen quality in dry cleaning workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1991; 20: 575–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700200502

40. Eskenazi B., Fenster L., Hudes M. et al. A study of the effect of perchloroethylene exposure on the reproductive outcomes of wives of dry-cleaning workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1991; 20: 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700200503

41. Leshkova I.V. Immunological disorders of the reproductive system caused by exposure to benzene. In: Proceedings of the 16th Russian National Congress with international participation «Profession and Health», Vladivostok, September 21–24, 2021. Vladivostok; 2021: 313-316.

42. Dolgih O.V., Dianova D.G., Alikina I.N., Krivcov A.V. Effect of benzene on programmed cell death of spermatozoa. Gigiena i sanitatiya. 2021; 10: 1060–1063. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-10-1060-1063 https://elibrary.ru/sseenj

43. Katukam V., Kulakarni M., Syed R., Alharbi K., Naik J. Effect of benzene exposure on fertility of male workers employed in bulk drug industries. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers. 2012; 16(6): 592–7.

44. Rubes J., Selevan S.G., Sram R.J. et al. GSTM1 genotype influences the susceptibility of men to sperm DNA damage associated with exposure to air pollution. Mutation Res. 2007; 625: 20–28.

45. Jurewicz J., Dziewirska E., Radwan M., Hanke W. Air pollution from natural and anthropic sources and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018; 16: 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0430-2

46. Guo Y., Ma Y., Chen G., Cheng J. The Effects of Occupational Exposure of Carbon Disulfide on Sexual Hormones and Semen Quality of Male Workers from a Chemical Fiber Factory. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016; 58(8): 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000823

47. Pallotti F., Pelloni M., Gianfrilli D. et al. Mechanisms of testicular disruption from exposure to bisphenol A and phtalates. J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020471

48. Smarr M.M., Kannan K., Sun L. et al. Preconception seminal plasma concentrations of endocrine disrupting chemicals in relation to semen quality parameters among male partners planning for pregnancy. Environ Res. 2018; 167: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.07.004

49. Wang B., Qin X., Xiao N. et al. Phthalate exposure and semen quality in infertile male population from Tianjin, China: Associations and potential mediation by reproductive hormones. Sci. Total Environ. 2020; 744: 140673. https://doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140673

50. Joensen U.N., Frederiksen H., Blomberg Jensen M. et al. Phthalate excretion pattern and testicular function: a study of 881 healthy Danish men. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012; 120: 1397–403. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205113

51. Hlisníková H., Petrovičová I., Kolena B. et al. Effects and Mechanisms of Phthalates’ Action on Reproductive Processes and Reproductive Health: A Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020; 17(18): 6811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186811

52. Mesquita I., Lorigo M., Cairrao E. Update about the disrupting-effects of phthalates on the human reproductive system. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2021; 88(10): 650–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23541

53. Sedha S., Lee H., Singh S. et al. Reproductive toxic potential of phthalate compounds – State of art review. Pharmacol Res. 2021; 167: 105536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105536

54. Meeker J.D., Calafat A.M., Hauser R. Urinary metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate are associated with decreased steroid hormone levels in adult men. J. Androl. 2009; 30: 287–97. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.108.006403

55. Al-Saleh I., Coskun S., Al-Doush I. et al. The relationships between urinary phthalate metabolites, reproductive hormones and semen parameters in men attending in vitro fertilization clinic. Sci. Total Environ. 2019; 658: 982–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.261

56. Hauser R., Williams P., Altshul L., Calafat A.M. Evidence of interaction between polychlorinated biphenyls and phthalates in relation to human sperm motility. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005; 113: 425–30. https://doi.org/10.1289 /ehp.7305

57. Huang L.P., Lee C.C., Hsu P.C., Shih T.S. The association between semen quality in workers and the concentration of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in polyvinyl chloride pellet plant air. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(1): 90e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.093

58. Benoff S., Jacob A., Hurley I.R. The risk of male subfecundity attributable to welding of metals. Studies of semen quality, infertility, fertility, adverse pregnancy outcome and childhood malignancy. Int. J. Androl. 1993; 16(1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.1993.tb01367.x

59. Bonde J.P. Hubbard S.A. Comparative toxicology of borates. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1998; 66: 343–357.

60. Benoff S., Jacob A., Hurley I.R. Male infertility and environmental exposure to lead and cadmium. Hum Reprod Update. 2000; 6(2): 107–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/6.2.107

61. Giulioni C., Maurizi V., De Stefano V. et al. The influence of lead exposure on male semen parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Toxicol. 2023; 118: 108387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108387

62. Apostoli P., Kiss P., Porru S. et al. Male reproductive toxicity of lead in animals and humans. Asclepios Study Group. Occup Environ Med. 1998; 55: 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.55.6.364

63. Osowski A., Fedoniuk L., Bilyk Y. et al. Lead Exposure Assessment and Its Impact on the Structural Organization and Morphological Peculiarities of Rat Ovaries. Toxics. 2023; 11(9): 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11090769

64. Bonde J.P., Joffe M., Apostoli P. et al. Sperm count and chromatin structure in men exposed to inorganic lead: lowest adverse effect levels. Occup. Environ. Med. 2002; 59: 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.59.4.234

65. Joffe M., Bisanti L., Apostoli P. et al. Asclepios. Time to pregnancy and occupational lead exposure. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60(10): 752–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.10.752

66. Benoff S., Centola G.M., Millan C. et al Increased seminal plasma lead levels adversely affect the fertility potential of sperm in IVF. Human Reproduction. 2003; 18: 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg020

67. Ashiru O.A., Odusanya O.O. Fertility and occupational hazards: review of the literature. Afr. J. Reprod. Health. 2009; 13(1): 159–65.

68. Williams P.L., Mínguez-Alarcón L., Korrick S.A. et al. Russian Children’s Study. Association of peripubertal blood lead levels with reproductive hormones and semen parameters in a longitudinal cohort of Russian men. Hum Reprod. 2022; 37(4): 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab288

69. Ilieva I., Sainova I., Yosifcheva K. Toxic Effects of Heavy Metals (Lead and Cadmium) on Sperm Quality and Male Fertility. Acta Morphol. Anthropol. 2020; 27: 63–75.

70. Manouchehri A., Shokri S., Pirhadi M. et al. The effects of toxic heavy metals lead, cadmium and copper on the epidemiology of male and female infertility. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2022; 26(4): 627–630. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220013

71. Zhegalova I.V., Chumakova Z.V., Yurasov V.V. Cadmium and male reproductive health. Mikroelementy v meditsine. 2018; 19; 1: 24–34.

72. Osadchuk L.V., Popova A.V., Erkovich A.A. et al. The impact of smoking and alcohol on reproductive health. Urologiya. 2017; 4: 62–67.

73. Panchal H., Bhardwaj J.K. Quercetin Supplementation Alleviates Cadmium Induced Genotoxicity-Mediated Apoptosis in Caprine. Testicular Cells. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023; 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-023-04038-8

74. Arab H.H., Gad A.M., Reda E. et al. Activation of autophagy by sitagliptin attenuates cadmium-induced testicular impairment in rats: Targeting AMPK/mTOR and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways. Life Sci. 2021; 269: 119031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119031

75. Kumar S., Sathwara N.G., Gautam A.K. Semen quality of industrial workers occupationally exposed to chromium. J. Occup. Health. 2005; 47(5): 424–30. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.47.424

76. Das J., Kang M.H., Kim E. et al. Hexavalent chromium induces apoptosis in male somatic and spermatogonial stem cells via redox imbalance. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 13921. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13921

77. Li Y., Gao Q., Li M. et al. Cadmium, Chromium, and Copper Concentration plus Semen-Quality in Environmental Pollution Site, China. Iran J Public Health. 2014; 43(1): 35–41.

78. Egorova A.M. Reproductive health of men employed in the metallurgical industry. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2021; 170–173.

79. Danadevi K., Rozati R., Reddy P.P., Grover P. Semen quality of Indian welders occupationally exposed to nickel and chromium. Reprod Toxicol. 2003; 17(4): 451–6.

80. Martinez C.S., Escobar A.G., Uranga-Ocio J.A. et al. Aluminum exposure for 60 days at human dietary levels impairs spermatogenesis and sperm quality in rats. Reprod. Toxicol. 2017; 73: 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.08.008

81. Yokel R.A. Aluminum reproductive toxicity: a summary and interpretation of scientific reports. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2020; 50(7): 551–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2020.1801575

82. Gorkem T., Abdullah K., Emrullah T., Onur O. The effect of seminal plasma cadmium and lead levels on semen parameters in male subjects of infertile couples: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021; 41(6): 946–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1820459

83. Machado-Neves M. Effect of heavy metals on epididymal morphology and function: An integrative review. Chemosphere. 2022; 291(Pt 2): 133020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133020

84. Giulioni C., Maurizi V., Castellani D. et al. The environmental and occupational influence of pesticides on male fertility: A systematic review of human studies. Andrology. 2022; 10(7): 1250–1271. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13228

85. Hamed M.A., Akhigbe T.M., Adeogun A.E. et al. Impact of organophosphate pesticides exposure on human semen parameters and testosterone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14: 1227836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1227836

86. Knapke E.T., Magalhaes D.P., Dalvie M.A. et al. Environmental and occupational pesticide exposure and human sperm parameters: A Navigation Guide review. Toxicology. 2022; 465: 153017.

87. Montano L., Pironti C., Pinto G., et al. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in the Environment: Occupational and Exposure Events, Effects on Human Health and Fertility. Toxics. 2022. 10(7): 365.

88. Tøttenborg S.S., Hougaard K.S., Deen L. et al. Prenatal exposure to airborne polychlorinated biphenyl congeners and male reproductive health. Hum Reprod. 2022; 37(7): 1594–1608. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac079

89. Steinberger A., Klinefelter G. Sensitivity of sertoli and leydig cells to xenobiotics in vitro models. Reprod Toxicol. 1993; 7(1): 23–37.

90. Chigrinec S.V. Vliyanie triklozana i bisfenola na fragmentaciyu DNK spermatozoidov. Vestnik Soveta molodyh uchyonyh i specialistov Chelyabinskoj oblasti. 2019; 2; 2(25): 61–64.

91. Zaitsev V.A., Khalimov Yu.Sh. Influence of the functional state of androgen status on spermatogenesis indices in military personnel of chemical weapons destruction facilities. Modern problems of military personnel health protection: Coll. articles of the jubilee scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 15th anniversary of the foundation of the S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy Research Center. Saint Petersburg; 2016: 101–102.

92. Zaitsev V.A., Tsepkova G.A., Goverdovsky Yu.B. Reproductive health of men under the influence of a complex of harmful professional and environmental factors. Vrach. 2020; 8: 45–53.

93. Zaitsev V.A., Khalimov Yu.Sh. The influence of relative testosterone deficiency on the main androgen-dependent systems of the body of military personnel serving at chemical weapons destruction facilities. Rossijskij biomedicinskij zhurnal. 2017; 18: 425–440.

94. Zaitsev V.A., Khalimov Yu.Sh., Goverdovsky Yu.B. The state of spermatogenesis in military personnel of chemically hazardous facilities depending on the length of service with toxic chemicals. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy: Proceedings of the jubilee all-Russian scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the Department of Military Field Therapy of the S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy «Military Field Therapy: from Origins to Development Prospects». St. Petersburg. 2015; 4(52): 65–66

95. Liu H.X., Qin W.H., Wang G.R. et al. Some altered concentrations of elements in semen of workers exposed to trinitrotoluene. Occup Environ Med. 1995; 52: 842–845.

96. Wang X., Tian X., Ye B. et al. Gaseous pollutant exposure affects semen quality in central China: a cross-sectional study. Andrology. 2020; 8(1): 117e24. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12655

97. Guven A., Kayikci A., Cam K. et al. Alterations in semen parameters of toll collectors working at motorways: does diesel exposure induce detrimental effects on semen? Andrologia. 2008; 40: 346–51.

98. Bian Q., Xu L.C., Wang S.L. et al. Study on the relation between occupational fenvalerate exposure and spermatozoa DNA damage of pesticide factory workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004; 61: 999–1005.

99. Celik-Ozenci C., Tasatargil A., Tekcan M. et al. Effect of abamectin exposure on semen parameters indicative of reduced sperm maturity: a study on farmworkers in Antalya (Turkey). Andrologia. 2012; 44: 388–95.

100. Schrader S.M., Breitenstein M.J., Lowe B.D. Cutting off the nose to save the penis. J Sex Med. 2008; 5(8): 1932–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00867.x

101. Adriansjah R., Syahreza A., Noegroho B.S. et al. Correlation between Motorcycle Riding and Erectile Dysfunction on Online Motorcycle Taxi Drivers. Urol. Res. Pract. 2023; 49(2): 112–115. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22174


Review

For citations:


Fesenko M.A., Golovaneva G.V., Miteleva T.Yu. Reproductive disorders in male workers under the influence of a chemical production factor. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2024;64(8):531-541. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2024-64-8-531-541. EDN: jtvgmz

Views: 248


ISSN 1026-9428 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8945 (Online)